In small quick, slightly fun tasks, like this one recently just done it is very useful and probably better on paper to be working in groups of five to six. therefore there's more people to get more work done. However there are some cons to this.
One con is that not everyone in our group actually had a role free to be assigned with. this is obviously not great for these people because they wont have anything to do. The group size is definitely something I will consider when re-choosing groups and pairing up with people in the future.
Even if someone isn't the best in the role that they're been given compared to others outside of the group, if the others are supportive and straight forward everyone can learn off of each other and as a result work to get better outcomes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
This is my completed poster and I am happy with the outcome of such work. I believe it withholds multiple conventions of music artists an... -
Major record and independent record labels. Between the two, what are the main differences? One of the biggest differences between the t...
-
Adorno and Horkheimer argued that the culture industry created an ongoing 'assembly line character' which usually successfully are r...
No comments:
Post a Comment